Kaspr pricing, features and alternatives

The short answer

Buy Kaspr if LinkedIn is where your pipeline starts and European mobile numbers are the thing you keep failing to find. At €45 per user per month billed annually on Starter and €79 on Business, it is priced as a rep tool rather than a platform, and credits are shared across the team and roll over month to month, so one heavy prospector does not strand the rest of the seats.

Skip it Skip Kaspr if you need intent data, account scoring or large-scale list building, because those are a different product class and Kaspr does not pretend otherwise. Skip it if most of your buyers sit outside Europe, where its coverage claim is weakest. And skip it if your legal team will not sign off on third-party contact data: one Reddit user reported receiving a GDPR notice from Kaspr, and that conversation belongs before the purchase, not after.

Where Kaspr fits

Kaspr fits individual reps and small outbound teams whose working day already runs through LinkedIn. The product is a Chrome extension that surfaces emails and mobile numbers on a profile, so there is no list-building workflow to learn and no data warehouse to connect. La Growth Machine's review puts it plainly: almost no learning curve, install the extension and start pulling contact data. That is the whole value proposition, and it is why it lands with teams that do not have a RevOps function to configure something heavier.

The geography matters more here than with most data vendors. Kaspr's own comparison page cites more than 120 million European B2B contacts, and the company has been owned by Cognism since 2022, which is the larger European data business. If your territory is DACH, Benelux, France or the Nordics, that focus is the reason to shortlist it. If your territory is North America or APAC, test coverage on your real target list before you commit, because the claim you are buying is explicitly regional.

Credits are the unit of consumption, and they behave better than most. Starter includes 100 phone credits per user per month and Business 200 phone plus 200 direct email credits. Credits are pooled across the team rather than locked to a seat, unused monthly credits roll over, and an annual plan loads all twelve months upfront. For a team where two SDRs do most of the dialing and three AEs dip in occasionally, pooling is worth real money: you size the pool to total usage instead of to your heaviest user.

The ceiling shows up as soon as you want more than a contact record. Kaspr is not where intent data, account scoring or multi-thousand-row list building live. Teams that outgrow it usually move up to Cognism's European data platform, which is the same parent company and the natural upgrade path, or sideways to LeadIQ for capture that syncs into a sequencer. Lusha is the closest like-for-like, and Kaspr publishes its own Kaspr against Lusha page, which tells you who it thinks it is competing with. The wider field is in our prospecting software directory.

Privacy review is a real work item, not a formality. Contact data tools in Europe sit on a legal basis your counsel needs to understand, Kaspr's own buyers search for whether it is GDPR compliant, and a Reddit user reported receiving a GDPR notice from the company. Put data sourcing and the subject-access request process in front of legal during the trial, and have the answer written down before a procurement committee asks for it. Our data enrichment explainer covers how this data lands in a CRM record in the first place.

What Kaspr replaces cleanly: the manual hunt for a mobile number, a per-rep subscription to a lighter contact finder, and the spreadsheet where profile URLs go to die. What it does not replace: a data platform that scores accounts, a sequencer, or the CRM hygiene process that decides what happens to a contact once it is captured. Those are separate purchases, and a €45 seat does not make any of them unnecessary.

Kaspr pricing

Kaspr publishes its rates, and it publishes them in euros, which is the first thing to fix in a budget built in dollars. The figures verified in our September 2026 check are a free tier at €0, Starter at €45 per user per month billed annually (€59 monthly), Business at €79 billed annually (€99 monthly), and a custom Organization or Enterprise plan that is annual only with a five-user minimum. Kaspr's plan note also lists Starter in US dollars at $49 billed annually and $65 monthly, so a dollar-denominated budget has one anchor at the entry tier and nothing at Business.

Plans and list rates in euros

Free

€0. Five phone and five direct email credits a month, 100 exports a year. Enough to test accuracy, not enough to prospect with.

Starter

€45 per user per month billed annually, or €59 monthly. 100 phone credits a month, unlimited B2B emails, 12,000 exports a year. Kaspr lists this tier in dollars as $49 annual and $65 monthly.

Business

€79 per user per month billed annually, or €99 monthly. 200 phone and 200 direct email credits a month, 30,000 exports a year, API on request. This is the tier a dialing team lands on.

Organization / Enterprise

Custom quote, annual billing only, five-user minimum. Adds intent data, SSO and advanced Salesforce enrichment.

What ten seats cost in euros

Ten seats on Business is 10 x €79 x 12 = €9,480 a year on annual billing, against 10 x €99 x 12 = €11,880 on monthly, so the annual commitment saves €2,400 at that size. The same team on Starter pays 10 x €45 x 12 = €5,400. The €4,080 gap between Starter and Business at ten seats is not a feature argument, it is a credit argument: Business buys 10 x 200 x 12 = 24,000 phone credits a year, where Starter buys 10 x 100 x 12 = 12,000.

Price the credits before the seats, because credits are what runs out. Extra phone credits cost €0.20 to €0.35 each depending on pack size, so a thousand top-up credits lands between €200 and €350. Compare that against the per-seat step up: if your team needs an extra 12,000 phone credits a year, buying them as top-ups costs €2,400 to €4,200, which is in the same range as moving ten seats from Starter to Business and getting the direct email credits and the larger export allowance along with them. Run that comparison with your own usage, since pooling and rollover mean the answer depends on how uneven your reps are.

The renewal terms deserve the same attention as the rate. Annual plans load all twelve months of credits upfront, which is good for a team with lumpy demand and bad for a team that cancels quietly: a Trustpilot reviewer complains about a tacit renewal and a charge of 1,080 EUR after months of non-use. Find the cancellation window, put the notice date in a calendar owned by a person rather than by a team, and confirm in writing what happens to unused rolled-over credits when you downgrade. Our data enrichment vendor comparison is the scoring sheet for running Kaspr against two other providers on the same list.

Kaspr's pricing is honest and small, and the two things that move it are currency and credits. Convert the euro rates into your own budget currency yourself rather than assuming the dollar figures scale, since only Starter is published in dollars. Then size phone credits against a real month of dialing, agree the renewal notice period, and ask what accuracy the vendor expects in your specific countries. How we review software sets out what we verify on a pricing page and what we do not.

What Kaspr gives up

You give up a dollar price list. Kaspr prices in euros at every tier, and the only dollar figures on the plan it publishes are $49 and $65 for Starter. A US buyer therefore carries exchange-rate risk on the line item and cannot compare Business against a dollar-priced rival without doing the conversion themselves. If your finance team requires a fixed dollar rate for the term, raise it before the contract, because the published model does not offer one.

You give up everything above the contact record. No intent data on the published tiers, no account scoring, no large-scale list building. Kaspr's job ends when the email and the phone number arrive, and the rest of your motion has to exist elsewhere. Intent data and advanced Salesforce enrichment appear only on the quoted Organization plan, which is annual-only with a five-user minimum, so the upgrade is a different purchase rather than a toggle.

You give up uniform global coverage. The pitch is European depth, with more than 120 million European B2B contacts cited on Kaspr's own comparison page. That is a strength in Europe and a warning everywhere else. Test your three weakest regions during the trial and count usable records rather than returned records, because a phone number that does not connect still consumed ten times the credits of an email on most data tools.

You give up a quiet exit. Annual plans bill twelve months of credits upfront and renewal is where the complaints concentrate: a Trustpilot reviewer describes a tacit renewal and a charge of 1,080 EUR after months of non-use. The mitigation is unglamorous and it works. Record the notice window, name an owner, and get cancellation terms in the order form rather than in a support thread.

You give up a short privacy conversation. European contact data invites questions your legal team will want answered on paper: where records come from, what the legal basis is, and how a subject-access or deletion request is handled. One Reddit user reported receiving a GDPR notice from Kaspr. None of that makes the tool unusable, and all of it is cheaper to resolve during a free-tier test than during a procurement review.

How Kaspr compares

Read this table with the currency in mind: Kaspr publishes in euros and the four alternatives below publish in dollars or quote, so the columns are not a like-for-like conversion and the point is the shape of each model rather than which number is smaller. Kaspr and Lusha compete directly on LinkedIn contact capture at a per-seat rate, and Kaspr publishes its own comparison against Lusha, which is a fair signal of who it is fighting. LeadIQ sells the same capture motion but prices by credit volume and caps its self-serve plan at five users, so a ten-rep team goes to a quote. Hunter is email-first and cheap, and it will not help you with mobile numbers at all. Cognism is the upgrade path rather than a rival: same parent company, enterprise European data, quoted at every tier. The last column is the one to read twice, because each of these breaks in a different place.

What to test in a Kaspr trial

Kaspr's free plan gives you five phone and five direct email credits a month, which is too small to prospect with and exactly right for an accuracy test. Run the plan below to produce two numbers for the business case: usable records per hundred attempts in your own markets, and credits consumed per booked conversation.

1. Pull 50 of your real target contacts, not generic profiles, and weight them toward the countries you sell into. Accuracy claims are regional, so a global sample will hide the problem you care about.
2. Record email bounce rate and phone connect rate separately. An 80% email hit rate with a 20% connect rate is a different product from the reverse, and the second one is what justifies the phone credits.
3. Count credits, not lookups. At 100 phone credits a month per user on Starter and 200 on Business, work out how many numbers a dialing rep needs in a week and multiply up before you choose a tier.
4. Test the pooling and rollover behaviour with two users at different intensities. Confirm that one rep burning through the pool does not block the other, and that unused credits carry into the next month as advertised.
5. Export a list and get it into your CRM or sequencer the way you would in production. Check duplicate handling and field mapping, because a capture tool that creates second copies of existing contacts costs you more in cleanup than it saves in research.
6. Send Kaspr's data sourcing and privacy documentation to legal while the trial is running, and ask specifically how deletion and subject-access requests are handled.
7. Before signing, get the renewal and cancellation terms in writing, including the notice period and what happens to rolled-over credits on downgrade. This is the single most common complaint about Kaspr and the easiest one to defuse in advance.

Kaspr questions buyers ask

Is Kaspr worth it?

For LinkedIn-heavy reps selling into Europe, reviewers say yes. Test accuracy on your own contacts first.

How does Kaspr work?

A Chrome extension shows contact details on LinkedIn profiles, which you can save and export.

How to use Kaspr?

Reps work inside LinkedIn: open a target profile, and the extension surfaces the email and phone number Kaspr holds for that person, which you then save to a list or export. Phone numbers draw on a monthly credit allowance, so usage is metered rather than unlimited.

How do I add Kaspr to Chrome?

Kaspr ships as a Chrome extension, so you install it in the browser and sign in to your Kaspr account. The free plan gives you 5 phone and 5 direct email credits a month, which is enough to confirm the extension works on your target personas before anyone pays.

Is Kaspr GDPR compliant?

Buyers often ask this. Review Kaspr's data sourcing and privacy documentation with your legal team.

How much does Kaspr cost?

Kaspr lists Starter at €45 and Business at €79 per user per month billed annually (€59 and €99 monthly), plus a free plan and custom Organization plan. A 10-seat Business team pays about €9,480 a year. Checked September 2026.

What is the best free LinkedIn extension for finding contact details?

There is no single answer, because the free tiers meter different things. Kaspr's free plan allows 5 phone and 5 direct email credits a month and 100 exports a year. LeadIQ's free plan covers one user and 50 credits a month, where a phone number costs 10 credits. Lusha also runs a free tier. Test all three on the same 50 contacts.

Is there a free trial for Kaspr?

Kaspr has a free plan with 5 phone credits and 5 direct email credits a month, according to its pricing page in September 2026.

Related

If Kaspr is on your shortlist, the comparison most teams run is against Lusha for the same LinkedIn capture job, with LeadIQ where the capture has to land in a sequencer and Cognism as the European data platform you graduate into. The rest of the category sits in our prospecting software directory, and our data enrichment vendor comparison turns this page into a scoring sheet you can run on one shared list.

Kaspr sits in our Prospecting Software directory.